The Honourable Thieves
THE HONOURABLE THIEVES
[This story isn’t just about a
stolen wallet. It’s about what we keep, what we lose or choose to forget and
about the strange decency and perception that sometimes reveals itself in
unexpected places]
A
short trip from our hotel in Zurich took us to the town’s airport-terminal.
When the attendant put my luggage on the
scale, I wanted to get out my wallet
with my credit cards so as to pay a
surcharge. To my dismay it was gone: I had been pickpocketed.
Fortunately, Pat had her
‘supplementary’ credit card ready. We paid the extra for excess luggage and
then I went over to the police department. To my dismay, the somewhat sleepy
officer-in-charge was not sympathetic or, in the very least, supportive.
Explaining that incidents of this sort were common, he took my details and
encouraged me to proceed to the airport.
In London, where we stayed with my
brother-in-law’s family, Alvin wanted to know how it had happened.
“Some people pushed against me
and somebody punched my ribs. I punched
back!”
“I suspect that one member of the
gang pinched your wallet at that very moment. This happens when you lose your
cool,” pointed out Alvin.
“Can be,” I conceded. “What would
you have done?”
“I usually have a zipper on my
pocket. It makes pickpocketing more difficult.”
All in all, the loss was bearable.
Naturally, I had to ring up my bank – the issuers of my credit cards. As
expected, they took the matter in their stride. The loss of a card was routine.
Alvin lent me some money. We were
able to go out for luncheons and dinners. One day, Alvin and Kerstin drove us
to Hampton Court. I had visited it before, but was glad to have a second go.
Just as before, the paintings hanging on the walls were fascinating. Later, we
spent some time on the grounds and, like many others, got lost in the famed
maze. We had to wait patiently until one of the attendants guided us out.
It was a pleasant break.
Nonetheless, I kept fretting about my wallet. Kerstin, who noted my depressed
mood, could not resist asking me: “Peter, you didn’t really lose much money and
the problems arising from the theft of the cards have been sorted out. Well,
what is the matter?”
“Just chagrin,” I tried to sound
placid. Pat, my wife, stepped to my aid. In an attempt to allay Kerstin’s misgiving, she observed:
“Peter is like that. He’ll fret until it is all sorted out.” Kerstin smiled.
But her shrewd eyes indicated she was not convinced.
She was right. Pat had remained
with her family in Singapore for seven weeks before joining me in Hamburg.
During that period, I mixed with fellows from other countries, who came to the
famed Institute of Comparative Law to further their own projects. One of them –
fair Liselot – worked in a discipline akin to mine. Further, like me, she was
versed in German literature, music and culture in general. One evening we
intend to go, together with some other visitors, to a show of Kleist performed
in a well-known theatre. When these others dropped out, we went on our own.
After the show, we had a late
supper in an eatery. I was charmed by her vivid critique of the performance and
decided to see more of her. During the next few weeks, we went together to some
avant-garde performances at secondary theatres, to the famed modern
opera house, which showed a piece by Brecht and Weil, and eventually to the
philharmonic orchestra.
Liselot savoured Brahms’ violin
concerto. I, too, was roused by its third movement: the lively rondo. When we
arrived back at the Institute (where both of us had studio apartments) after a
pleasant stroll, she invited me for a nightcap.
We saw a great deal of one another
during her remaining weeks in Hamburg. She told me all about her marriage,
which would have been dehydrated but for her two children, who were good glue.
I – in turn – opened about my own sterile and predominantly unhappy marriage.
“What keeps you together?” she
wanted to know. “You don’t have children and your European milieu must be as
alien to her just as her stern Chinese outlook is to you.”
“Yes, in many ways we have remained
strangers. What keep us together is the fear of loneliness. That too is a
glue.”
“I understand,” she observed
gently.
I went with Liselot to the airport,
from which she took a direct flight back to her hometown. Just before we
parted, she handed me an envelope. The sparse note in it read: “Au Revoir?” I
had kept this note in one of the empty compartments of my wallet. Its loss grieved
me far more than the stolen money.
For some four weeks we stayed with
my in-laws. We then took a brief trip to Cambridge, where I got from its
library photocopies of materials not available at the Institute. From there we
went straight to Heathrow, where we boarded a direct flight to Hamburg.
A pile of letters was waiting for
me. One included a replacement credit card. A separate letter, posted by my bank
in Singapore two days after the dispatch of the card, was a standard form,
advising me how to activate the token when overseas. Obviously, the highly
efficient bank had developed a strategy seeking to ensure that the replacement
would not be activated by an imposter.
I then turned to the third
envelope. It had been posted in Zurich
by an individual unknown to me. As I
tore it open, I was surprised to see that it contained the wallet that had been
pinched in the air-terminal. The thief must have gleaned my address from the
library card placed in the wallet. Apart from the bank notes – which were
missing – the contents had not been disturbed. But the sender had perused it.
In a bold handwriting he had added, beneath Liselot’s dedication, four German words,
which, when translated into English, read: “hopefully, before you forget.”
For a few minutes, I sat
thunderstruck. I then realised that, in his own way, the thief was an honest
human being. True, he broke the law when he stole my wallet. If caught, he
might have been sentenced to a few weeks in prison. But then, pilfering was his
current profession. He might have been driven to it, if he had been retrenched
or forced to resign a job. Unemployment was rampant all over Europe.
On further reflection, I asked
myself whether the thief’s act was more acrimonious than the lapse that a
married man, like me, might yield to when tempted? Undoubtedly, the law
rendered the thief’s act criminal. But, from a purely moral point of view,
wasn’t his act of returning the wallet an indication that he was – in a manner
of speaking – an honest person?
For a while I kept musing. It would
really have been nice to make that fellow’s acquaintance. The sentiment
expressed by him was clear and realistic. To my own surprise, I tore the scrap
of paper to pieces and discarded them. My eye then caught an internal
memorandum, sent to me by the Institute’s librarian. It drew my attention to a
few books and articles pertaining to my research project that I had overlooked
up to that time.
I spent the next few weeks on these
new materials. When I finished their perusal, it was time to return to my post
in Melbourne. We spent the last few days in Hamburg with Alvin and Kerstin, who
built in a stopover in this ancient Hanseatic town, on their way to a break in
Sweden.
Both were pleased – quite surprised
– to hear that the wallet had been returned by the culprit, who stole the
money.
“And, Peter,” grinned Kerstin
during our pleasant meal in a seafood restaurant, “did that scoundrel leave
everything else untouched?”
“He did, rather,” I assured her.
“But I thought it best to destroy things I no longer needed.”
“What an excellent idea,” she
summed up, looking slightly amused.
“I am glad to hear you say this,”
Pat stepped in unexpectedly. “You know, Peter tends to hoard things, even after
they are no longer needed.”
Comments
Post a Comment